Tag Archives: infants

“just following the law…”

Defending actions that are obviously and inherently evil is not easy. The excuse of obeying the law does not fly. And blaming your actions on others also doesn’t work. Just ask all the Nazis who were tried for war crimes at Nuremburg at the end of World War II.

Every person in this corrupt administration who supports and defends the splitting up of asylum seeking families is guilty of evil. Creating internment camps for toddlers and infants is not defensible, period.

Call it crimes against humanity or anything else you want, But history will show that the actions taken on our border with Mexico will rank as another ugly, dark and evil episode in the history of the United States.

Old Fangak field report

Stop Hunger Now works in dozens of countries around the world. Our implementing partners are dedicated and caring folks who are committed to helping the poor and hungry.

Old Fangak in South Sudan is the most remote and difficult place we work. The need there is immense and the challenges are almost unimaginable. But, by working together we are making real difference. Here is a report we received this past week from Gretchen Stone, a volunteer nurse working with Dr. Jill Seaman in the village.

Subject: Feeding issues

Lots of people here are hungry.  It’s the end of the dry season, which means the harvest finished about 4 months ago.  Old Fangak and its surrounding villages are normally home to 5000 souls. The resurgent civil war has meant a population boom of 30,000 internally displaced people (IDPs), most of whom arrived about a year ago.  You can imagine what that does to the food supply.  World Food Program provides food for IDPs, but WFP has its own issues. They were supposed to fly a month’s worth of food in this week, but emailed that they would be here April 7 instead–to which Jill wrote a very tactful letter saying she knows how challenged they must be, and how hungry folks are here–please don’t take this merely as a scheduling problem–and now they are coming on Tuesday!

But the feeding issues closest to home often sit right in our laps.

Many of the IDPs are big city folks.  You can tell by the way they dress.  Sometimes they have cell phones (no reception here, but they still play music) or fingernail polish. Women wear outfits that match, and often wigs with hundreds of tiny braids, and dangly gold earrings.

In the big city, they see doctors who tout infant formula in place of breast milk.  The market here no longer has bread for sale, let alone infant formula. The other day, a regal woman with her so-cute-you-want-to-eat-him three month old presented with an official letter from the commissioner, asking that we give her formula. Pity.  We explained that breast is best, and we can’t provide formula, but we could offer her some fortified milk powder to improve her supply.  She was not impressed.

Yesterday, a scrawny, shriveled 2 1/2 month old appeared.  His healthy-looking mom explained that his jaw wouldn’t grasp her nipple properly.  He weighed in at 2 kg even. His facial shape and muscle tone indicate a congenital problem, which we are woefully unable to diagnose, let alone do much about. Jill explained that this is “from God”.  We tried a bottle, but found that dribbling milk into his mouth with a syringe worked best.  They went home with a tub of milk powder.  We are not at all confident that he will live to finish it.

Then came the little sweetheart, with a child health card saying “Feeding problem. Refer Old Fangak.”

Her feeding problem?  When this kid was 4 days old, her mum was bitten by a cobra, and died.  Grandma spoon-fed her milk for 3 months–but then the cow died as well!  It had taken a week from the time the referral was written for Grandma to walk the 12 hours, with babe in this basket on her head, to request help.  We figured that was one of the better justifications for infant formula.  She went home with a bottle, mosquito net and blankets as well.

Now we have one tub left.  What baby out there needs it most?

the first 1,000 days revisited

My June 3rd post, 1,000 days to change the future, focused on the need to address undernutrition during critical window between conception and a child’s second birthday. Focusing on this first critical 1,000 days of a child’s life can not only spell the difference between life and death, it can be the deciding factor for a child’s health and well-being for the rest of his or her life.

Investing in improved nutrition during a child’s first 1,000 days is vital for enabling children to live healthier and more productive lives. Studies have demonstrated that providing proper nutrition for children during this 1,000 day window can accomplish more than we can even begin to imagine. Providing proper nutrition during this window can:

  • save more than 1,000,000 lives every year
  • significantly reduce the burden of major diseases such as tuberculosis, malaria and HIV/AIDS
  • reduce the risk of developing non-communicable diseases such as diabetes and other chronic conditions later in life
  • improve an individual’s educational and earning potential.

There is also evidence that shows providing proper nutrition during the first 1,000 days of a child’s life can increase a county’s GDP by at least 2-3 percent annually.

The first 1,000 days of a child’s life are critical for providing a healthier and more prosperous future.  Proper nutrition during this period is one of the best investment of resources we can make, and solutions to make this happen are readily available. These solutions are both affordable and cost-effective. Simple solutions include:

  • Ensuring mothers and infants get the necessary vitamins and minerals they need
  • Promoting good nutritional practices (such as breastfeeding), and appropriate foods that are healthy for infants
  • providing special therapeutic foods for malnourished infants

Addressing a child’s nutritional needs during the first 1,000 days of life is a simple, yet powerful way to change the future. Ensuring proper nutrition for children during their first 1,000 days is an investment toward achieving lasting progress toward global health…and a world without hunger.